anti pelp1 polyclonal antibody (Bethyl)
Structured Review
![( A ) Cryo-EM structure of the human pre-60S ribosome with the rixosome bound [PDB ID:8FL2 ]. Only the conserved scaffolding core of the rixosome <t>(PELP1</t> Rix1 domain, WDR18, and TEX10) is visible in the structure. Also see fig. S1. The rixosome core is formed by two copies of the PELP1 Rix1 domain (shades of teal), two copies of WDR18 (shades of orange), and one copy of TEX10 (pink). ( B ) Structure of the rixosome core indicating the putative positions of the PELP1 C-terminal IDRs. It remains unclear how the three rixosome enzyme LAS1L (ribonuclease, RNase), NOL9 (poly-nucleotide kinase, PNK), and SENP3 (SUMO protease) associate with the rixosome core. ( C ) Schematic of C-terminal FLAG-tagged PELP1 variant/truncation constructs (1 to 6) used to affinity purify the rixosome in the co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiment displayed in (D). Checkmarks and X marks denote qualitative binding results for specific rixosome components to the PELP1 variant used for reconstitution and co-IP. * denotes a notable decrease (but still detectable) in signal for specific rixosome components. ( D ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot using antibodies for the endogenous rixosome proteins qualitatively identified the presence or absence of rixosome proteins (endogenous and exogenous) upon co-IP from human cells of PELP1 variants in (C). EV denotes empty vector control.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_2926/pmc12292926/pmc12292926__sciadv.adw4603-f1.jpg)
Anti Pelp1 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 47 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pelp1 polyclonal antibody/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 47 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "PELP1 coordinates the modular assembly and enzymatic activity of the rixosome complex"
Article Title: PELP1 coordinates the modular assembly and enzymatic activity of the rixosome complex
Journal: Science Advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw4603
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Cryo-EM structure of the human pre-60S ribosome with the rixosome bound [PDB ID:8FL2 ]. Only the conserved scaffolding core of the rixosome (PELP1 Rix1 domain, WDR18, and TEX10) is visible in the structure. Also see fig. S1. The rixosome core is formed by two copies of the PELP1 Rix1 domain (shades of teal), two copies of WDR18 (shades of orange), and one copy of TEX10 (pink). ( B ) Structure of the rixosome core indicating the putative positions of the PELP1 C-terminal IDRs. It remains unclear how the three rixosome enzyme LAS1L (ribonuclease, RNase), NOL9 (poly-nucleotide kinase, PNK), and SENP3 (SUMO protease) associate with the rixosome core. ( C ) Schematic of C-terminal FLAG-tagged PELP1 variant/truncation constructs (1 to 6) used to affinity purify the rixosome in the co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiment displayed in (D). Checkmarks and X marks denote qualitative binding results for specific rixosome components to the PELP1 variant used for reconstitution and co-IP. * denotes a notable decrease (but still detectable) in signal for specific rixosome components. ( D ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot using antibodies for the endogenous rixosome proteins qualitatively identified the presence or absence of rixosome proteins (endogenous and exogenous) upon co-IP from human cells of PELP1 variants in (C). EV denotes empty vector control.
Techniques Used: Cryo-EM Sample Prep, Scaffolding, Variant Assay, Construct, Immunoprecipitation, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Binding Assay, SDS Page, Western Blot, Plasmid Preparation, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Human rixosome cartoon indicating both copies of PELP1’s C-terminal IDR, with specific areas of interest labeled. ( B ) Sequence and structural characteristics of the PELP1 C-terminal IDR (residues 642 to 1130). AlphaFold3 secondary (II) structure predictions, disorder propensity (%), and polyproline secondary structure propensity (PPII score) are displayed per residue of the PELP1 IDR. ( C ) Amino acid distribution plots for negative [D (red) and E (yellow)], positive [R (brown) and K (blue)], glycine (G, gray), and proline (P, green) residues. ( D ) Schematic of C-terminal FLAG-tagged PELP1 variant/truncation constructs (1 to 7) used in the co-IP experiment displayed in (E) and (F). Checkmarks and X marks denote qualitative binding results for SENP3, MDN1, or histones to the PELP1 variant used for reconstitution and co-IP. ( E ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot using antibodies for the exogenous rixosome proteins upon co-IP from human cells of PELP1 variants in (D) + or − a nonspecific nuclease in the lysis buffer. These isolated rixosome complexes were natively eluted off the anti-FLAG affinity gel and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and total protein staining to qualitatively identify endogenous interactors copurifying with the human rixosome. Red arrows at bottom denote sample lanes with histone copurification. ( F ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot using specific antibodies for the endogenous protein targets copurifying with PELP1/rixosome complexes upon co-IP from human cells in (E) + a nonspecific nuclease in the lysis buffer. MDN1 qualitative binding was confirmed by Western blot. Nucleosome core histones (H2A-H2B-H3-H4) qualitative binding was determined to be specific to the PELP1 GAR and confirmed by Western blot to H3. ( G ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot from an endogenous PELP1 co-IP from HEK293FT cells + a nonspecific nuclease in the lysis buffer using PELP1-specific antibody. Endogenous MDN1 and H3 were detected by Western blot.
Techniques Used: Labeling, Sequencing, Residue, Variant Assay, Construct, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Binding Assay, SDS Page, Western Blot, Lysis, Isolation, Staining, Copurification
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Cartoon of the human rixosome highlighting the specific PELP1 IDR-MDN1 interaction region of interest. ( B ) Schematic of human AAA-ATPase MDN1 noting major protein domains. The six N-terminal AAA-ATPase domains are specifically noted as D1-D6. Also see fig. S3. ( C ) AlphaFold3 structural prediction of the entire human MDN1 AAA-ATPase domain bound to the experimentally determined region of the PELP1 IDR. Exact protein residues used for the prediction are noted in the panel. AlphaFold3 predicts a small helix of PELP1 (MDN1 interacting helix, MIH) binds to the D2H2α insert of MDN1. Also see fig. S4. ( D ) Zoom from (C) of predicted MDN1-PELP1 binding interface with PELP1 F1112 forming an aromatic anchor into a pocket of the MDN1 D2H2a. Also see fig. S3. ( E ) Multiple sequence alignment of PELP1 MIH region responsible for binding MDN1 D2H2a. Species abbreviations: Homo sapiens (H.s.), Mus musculus (M.m.), Bos taurus (B.t.), Aquila chrysaetos (A.c.), Xenopus laevis (X.l.), Danio rerio (D.r.), Branchiostoma lanceolatum (B.l.), Acanthaster planci (A.p.), Mytilus coruscus (M.c.), Drosophila melanogaster (D.m.), Dictyostelium discoideum (D.d.), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S.p.), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S.c.). ( F ) Schematic of C-terminal FLAG tagged PELP1 truncations, deletions, and point mutants (1 to 6) used for co-IPs to assay endogenous MDN1 binding from human cells in (G) and (H). ( G ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot using antibodies for the endogenous MDN1 protein and exogenous rixosome components upon co-IP of PELP1 variants in (F). All PELP1 MIH mutants failed to bind qualitatively to MDN1, supporting the predicted structural model of PELP1 MIH binding to MDN1 D2H2a in (C). ( H ) SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and total protein stain of FLAG PELP1 C terminus (residues 967 to 1130) alone copurifying MDN1 from cells. ( I ) A proposed mechanism for MDN1 regulation by PELP1/the rixosome in large ribosomal subunit maturation.
Techniques Used: Structural Proteomics, Binding Assay, Sequencing, SDS Page, Western Blot, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Cartoon of the human rixosome highlighting the GAR region. ( B ) Cartoon of the in vitro histone chaperoning assay illustrating potential IDR histone interactions that could form upon incubating PELP1 with H2A-H2B dimers and H3-H4 tetramers. Created in BioRender. Gordon, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/x62f662 . ( C ) Multiple sequence alignment of PELP1 GAR. Highly conserved stretches of glutamic acid residues are highlighted in magenta. Species abbreviations are the same as . ( D to F ) Histone chaperone assay with PELP1 IDR region 800 to 1130aa (D), PELP1 IDR region 887 to 966aa (E), and PELP1 IDR region 967 to 1140aa (negative control) (F). Postdialysis histone octamer and MBP-PELP1 variant mixed samples were subject to S200 gel filtration chromatography to assess histone binding to PELP1 GAR. Mixed samples at 1:1 (blue curve) and 2:1 (red curve) ratios exhibited migration shifts compared to unmixed controls, indicating stable binding. SDS-PAGE of peak fractions also indicate the presence of bound complexes. Histone octamer alone control sample exhibits two peaks corresponding to dissociated histone H2A-H2B dimers and H3-H4 tetramers. ( G ) Structure of the nucleosome core particle [PDB ID: 3LZ0 ]. DNA is colored on the basis of electrostatic surface. ( H ) AlphaFold3 structural prediction of the human histone octamer bound to one copy of the PELP1 GAR, 1:1 stoichiometry. Exact protein residues used for the prediction are noted in the panel (full-length human H2A 2 -H2B 2 -H3 2 -H4 2 used for octamer prediction). PELP1 GAR is predicted to be helical when bound to histones and is depicted as electrostatic surface representation. Also see fig. S5. ( I ) AlphaFold3 structural prediction of the human histone octamer bound to two copies of the PELP1 GAR, 2:1 stoichiometry. Exact protein residues used for the prediction are noted in the panel and same as (H). Also see fig. S6.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Sequencing, Negative Control, Variant Assay, Filtration, Chromatography, Binding Assay, Migration, SDS Page, Control, Structural Proteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Cartoon of the human rixosome highlighting the SENP3-interacting region. ( B ) N-terminal FLAG-tagged SENP3 truncations (1 to 3) used in the co-IP experiment displayed in (C). Checkmarks and X marks denote qualitative binding results for specific rixosome components in (C) to the SENP3 truncation used for co-IP. ( C ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot using antibodies for the endogenous rixosome proteins identified the presence or absence of rixosome proteins (endogenous and exogenous) upon co-IP with SENP3 truncations. ( D ) X-ray crystal structure of the SENP3 protease domain (311 to 574aa, dark blue) C532S mutant bound to the PELP1 SLiM peptide (764 to 781aa, teal) at 2.93 Å resolution. SENP3 active site with catalytic triad residues is circled in red. ( E ) PELP1 SLiM residues 765 to 767 (FVH motif) and 776 to 778 (VEI motif) form antiparallel β-strand interactions with SENP3 at β6* and β7, respectively. ( F ) The PELP1 SLiM binding interface with the SENP3 protease domain surface. ( G ) The PELP1 FVH motif secondary structure backbone interactions with SENP3 β6*. Putative backbone hydrogen bonding interactions are illustrated by dashed lines. Experimental electron density is displayed as a composite omit map contoured at σ = 0.152 e/Å 3 . ( H ) The PELP1 VEI motif secondary structure backbone interactions with SENP3 β7. Putative backbone hydrogen bonding interactions are illustrated by dashed lines with the experimental density shown as in (G). ( I ) Multiple sequence alignment of PELP1 SLiM and flanking regions. Species abbreviations are the same as . ( J ) Schematic of C-terminal FLAG-tagged PELP1 mutant constructs (1 to 5) used in the co-IP experiment displayed in (K). Checkmarks and X marks denote qualitative binding results for SENP3 (K) to the PELP1 mutant. ( K ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot identified the presence or absence of SENP3 and other rixosome proteins upon co-IP from human cells of PELP1 mutant constructs in (J).
Techniques Used: Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Binding Assay, SDS Page, Western Blot, Mutagenesis, Sequencing, Construct
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) curves exhibiting the formation of a complex between SENP3 protease domain 302 to 574aa and PELP1 SLiM -containing peptide 761 to 796aa. SDS-PAGE and total protein staining of SEC fractions are displayed below the x axis. ( B ) AlphaFold3 structural models of proSUMO substrates used in endopeptidase cleavage assays. Sequences of the proSUMO C-terminal tails (cleavage sites labeled with arrows) are shown below the structural models. ( C ) SDS-PAGE and total protein stain of in vitro SENP3 ± MBP-PELP1 SLiM endopeptidase activity assays against proSUMO1, −2, and −3 substrates. Decreasing concentrations (2500 to 0.12 nM) of SENP3 enzyme ± MBP-PELP1 761 to 796aa was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 5 μM proSUMO substrate. Cleaved proSUMO product is labeled with asterisks. Quantification curves representing percent (%) proSUMO endopeptidase cleavage correspond to the gel images and the enzyme concentration range was 1000 to 15.63 nM. SD was calculated from three independent experiments ( n = 3). ( D ) SDS-PAGE and total protein stain of in vitro SENP3 (C532A) ± MBP-PELP1 SLiM endopeptidase activity assay, illustrating no activity. ( E ) Quantification curves representing percent (%) proSUMO2 endopeptidase cleavage by SENP protease domain + PELP1 SLiM , SENP3 protease domain alone, or SENP5 protease domain alone during a time course (0 to 450 s). Enzyme concentration was kept constant at 1000 nM along with substrate concentration at 5 μM. Percent cleavage was calculated as in (C). SD was calculated from three independent assay samples ( n = 3). Raw gel images are displayed in fig. S13A. ( F ) Differential scanning fluorimetry curves exhibiting the thermal stabilization of the SENP3 protease domain upon addition of short (“s,” amino acids 764 to 781) and long (“l,” amino acids 764 to 792) PELP1 SLIM peptides. Boltzmann and first derivative curves are shown on the top and bottom of the panel, respectively. Values for change in T m is only shown for the first derivative.
Techniques Used: Size-exclusion Chromatography, SDS Page, Staining, Labeling, In Vitro, Activity Assay, Incubation, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) AlphaFold3 structural model of MBP-Flag-NPM1 (240 to 294aa) SUMO2 conjugate, with the cleavage site indicated with a red arrow. NPM1 SUMOylation site K263 depicted. ( B ) SDS-PAGE and total protein stain of in vitro SENP3 ± MBP-PELP1 SLiM isopeptidase activity assays against MBP-Flag-NPM1-SUMO2 conjugates. Decreasing concentrations (1000 to 3.9 nM) of SENP3 enzyme ± MBP-PELP1 761 to 796aa was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 15 μl of on-resin NPM1-SUMO2 conjugates. Cleaved free SUMO product is labeled. Red * on bands in control lanes denote MBP-Flag-NPM1 that copurifies without SUMO2 conjugation. ( C ) Quantification curves representing percent (%) cleavage of substrate over time correspond to the gel images in fig. S13B and the enzyme concentration used was 500 nM. SD was calculated from three independent experiments ( n = 3). ( D ) SDS-PAGE and Western blot of HA-tagged SUMO2 conjugated proteins detected in HEK293FT cell lysate. Changes in amount of HA-SUMO2 conjugated proteins in vivo was assayed after transfecting cells with wild-type or C532A catalytic mutant SENP3 in combination with titrated transfection of wild-type PELP1. Decreasing amounts of transfected DNA expressing exogenous PELP1 with wild-type SENP3 resulted in an overall dose-dependent increase of HA-SUMO2–conjugated proteins similar to that observed with SENP3 C532A (catalytic-dead mutant). ( E ) Same as (D) except HA-tagged SUMO1 was used.
Techniques Used: SDS Page, Staining, In Vitro, Activity Assay, Incubation, Labeling, Control, Conjugation Assay, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, In Vivo, Mutagenesis, Transfection, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Swiss army knife model of the rixosome. The PELP1-WDR18-TEX10 scaffolding core is analogous to the housing unit of the knife from which the different diverse tools extend outward, including scissors (RNase PNK RNA cutting), saw blade (SENP3 protease), and corkscrew (MDN1 ATPase motor remodeling). ( B ) Cartoon structural model of the full human rixosome. The scaffolding core (PELP1-WDR18-TEX10) represents the stable core of the rixosome complex from which enzymatic components are connected. The RNA processing complex RNase PNK (LAS1L-NOL9) is physically and flexibly tethered to the stable scaffolding core. The deSUMOylation enzyme SENP3 and AAA-ATPase MDN1 are distinctly integrated with the rixosome through PELP1’s C-terminal IDRs. ( C ) Proposed architectural model of the human rixosome bound to the pre-60S subunit [PDB ID: 8FL2 ]. PELP1’s IDRs organize the enzymatic functions of SENP3 and MDN1. ( D ) Proposed architectural model of the human rixosome bound to polycomb and functioning in gene silencing at facultative heterochromatin. PELP1’s IDRs likely organize multiple enzymatic and nonenzymatic functions at heterochromatin, including SENP3 and MDN1 activity, and putative histone chaperoning by the GAR.
Techniques Used: Scaffolding, Activity Assay



